Fort Smith Construction Dispute Lawyers

Fort Smith Construction Dispute Lawyers, AR

Find the Right Lawyer Now

Construction Dispute Law in Arkansas

When a property owner and a general contractor contract for a construction project to take place on some property in Fort Smith, Arkansas, whether it's a house, some landscaping, or a remodeling project, there is always a gamble that something can go wrong. In fact, at least a very minor setback may be more likely than not.

Most often, landowners and construction contractors are able to resolve minor to moderate disagreements between themselves, and litigation is rarely necessary. Nobody likes litigation, so, to this end, most construction contracts have built-in remedies in case something goes wrong, like set price reductions if construction is delayed.

And even if disputes can't be resolved so easily, the courts still don't necessarily have to get engaged. For example, a construction contract may require mediation before any further action is taken. Mediation is a process by which a third party tries to guide the parties to the dispute to a settlement. The mediator cannot, however, render any binding decision. Another avenue is arbitration. This is where the parties go to a private arbitration service, which can render a binding judgment (usually enforceable through contract law, as the parties agree in advance to abide by the arbitrator's decision). Arbitration has benefits over litigation, as the parties can have a say in choosing the arbitrator (allowing them to have their case arbitrated by an expert on construction disputes, for example).

Litigation of construction disputes in Fort Smith, Arkansas can be extremely time-consuming, stressful, and costly. Nevertheless, there are (relatively rare) occurrences where it is the only option.

Examples of Construction Disputes That Might Lead to Litigation in Fort Smith, Arkansas

Delays: If the contractor is culpable in a major delay in a construction project (a delay of weeks or months, for example), a lawsuit could result. If the contract particularly states that completion by a specific date is very important, or the builder has a good reason to know this, a court will often award the owner compensation for any economic harm caused by a delay.

Owner's Refusal to Pay: If the contractor completes the project, and the owner refuses to pay the agreed-upon price, the contractor will typically file a lawsuit to recover what is owed. Of course, the owner will typically claim that there is a good reason for not paying, arguing that the contractor didn't conform to the project's specifications, or that the quality of construction was unacceptably poor. In such a case, the court will have to decide if the contractor actually breached the contract by doing shoddy work, which could, at least in part, excuse the owner's duty to pay.

Subcontractor Disputes: When a construction company is contracted to complete a large project, there is typically a great deal of specialized work to be done which they aren't equipped to handle. As a result, they hire other contractors, who, in this arrangement, are subcontractors, to do some of the work. Nonetheless, the general contractor (the one that the landowner hired to do the work) is still accountable for the completion of the project - if a subcontractor causes a problem, the general contractor is on the hook for it. This sometimes leads to landowners suing general contractors for the mistakes of subcontractors. If the general contractor loses, and has to pay the client, the general contractor can then sue the subcontractor for whatever amount of money it had to pay.

Mechanic's Liens: Sometimes, when a contractor wins in a case against the landowner who hired him or her, and obtains a court order for payment, the contractor will still refuse to pay. Since a money judgment isn't worth much without a way to enforce it, the laws of many states have evolved to permit what's known as a "mechanic's lien." As a last resort, if a landowner refuses to pay the contractor for work done on the property, the contractor can force a sale of the property, and keep the proceeds, up to the amount of money owed.

Find a Fort Smith Lawyer that Specializes in Your Area of Need:

Can a Fort Smith, Arkansas Attorney Help?

If you have a construction dispute, you should first try to resolve it amicably with the other party. If this fails, it is almost always crucial to hire a Fort Smith, Arkansas construction disputes attorney, who can advise you on the next steps in the process.

54 Real Estate, Housing & Property Law cases posted to LegalMatch lawyers in Fort Smith

Construction Dispute Attorneys in the Largest AR Cities

Show Arkansas Cities

Construction Dispute Lawyers in Other Arkansas Cities and Towns


Find the Right Lawyer Now

Top Rated Lawyers

View attorney profiles and see how other LegalMatch users rate attorneys that may respond to your case.

Employment and Labor Law Lawyer
LegalMatch Employment and Labor Law Lawyer Joel C.

Joel C.

Sebastian, AR

Employment and Labor Law

Rating (19 users) *****
See Reviews
General Practice Lawyer
LegalMatch General Practice Lawyer Timothy W.

Timothy W.

Sebastian, AR

General Practice

Rating (3 users) *****
See Reviews
Employment and Labor Law Lawyer
LegalMatch Employment and Labor Law Lawyer Christopher M.

Christopher M.

Snohomish, WA

Employment and Labor Law

Rating (1 users) ****
See Reviews
Criminal Law Lawyer
LegalMatch Criminal Law Lawyer Borjan K.

Borjan K.

Will, IL

Criminal Law

Rating (1 users) *****
See Reviews

Need a Real Estate Lawyer?

No obligation - Lawyers compete for your case. Choose your issue & get started now:

Fort Smith Construction Dispute lawyer, Fort Smith Construction Dispute attorney, Fort Smith Construction Dispute lawyers, Fort Smith Construction Dispute attorneys, Construction Dispute attorney in Fort Smith